Commonwealth v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “where an appellant includes an issue in his Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement, such inclusion does not ‘resurrect’ a waived claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• E.K. v. J.R.A.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-08-07· cited 99×
• Com. v. Jones, C.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-12-16· cited 63×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Briggs
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-01-19· cited 417×
• Commonwealth v. Bruce
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-01-04· cited 261×
• Commonwealth v. Baumhammers
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-11-20· cited 216×
• Commonwealth v. Powell
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-09-24· cited 210×
• Commonwealth v. Melendez-Rodriguez
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-24· cited 173×
• Commonwealth v. May
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-11-23· cited 158×
• Steiner v. Markel
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-04-29· cited 143×
• Commonwealth v. Montalvo
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-09-24· cited 131×
• Tindall v. Friedman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-03-24· cited 87×
• Commonwealth v. Young
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-01-06· cited 75×
• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-08-15· cited 48×
• Commonwealth v. Van Horn
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-04-23· cited 36×