Commonwealth v. Melendez-Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] party cannot rectify the failure to preserve an issue by proffering it in response to a Rule 1925(b) order.”
• holding that “[a] party cannot rectify the failure to preserve an issue by proffering it in response to a Rule 1925(b) order.”
• holding that “[a] party cannot rectify the failure to preserve an issue by proffering it in response to a Rule 1925(b) order.”
• explaining that evidence of other crimes is admissible to show, inter alia, motive, intent, absence of mistake or accident, common scheme or plan, and identity
• explaining that evidence of other crimes is admissible to show, inter alia, motive, intent, absence of mistake or accident, common scheme or plan, and identity
• explaining that evidence of other crimes is admissible to show, inter alia, motive, intent, absence of mistake or accident, common scheme or plan, and identity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).