Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Smith

Citations

  • 167 A.3d 782
  • 2017 Pa. Super. 242
  • 2017 WL 3123868
  • 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 567

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that counsel cannot be found ineffective for failing to pursue a meritless claim
  • stating counsel cannot be found ineffective for failing to pursue a baseless or meritless claim
  • rejecting ineffectiveness -8- J-A10039-24 claim for failure to call an expert witness where petitioner failed to demonstrate an expert existed or was available and willing to testify at trial
  • addressing challenges to sufficiency of evidence for firearm offenses, simple assault, and REAP; deeming one issue related to sufficiency of evidence for resisting arrest waived for failure to develop claim on appeal; addressing challenge to suppression of evidence
  • petitioner failed to demonstrate prejudice resulting from trial counsel’s failure to object to competency of 11-year old victim to testify at trial for rape of child and other sex offenses
  • “[t]he presumption does not arise where a child witness is under age fourteen”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panella, Dubow, Elliott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.