Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Smith

Citations

  • 146 A.3d 257
  • 2016 Pa. Super. 187
  • 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 472
  • 2016 WL 4493692

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the factfinder could find infer consciousness of guilt from the appellant’s flight from police into a basement as part of the Commonwealth’s evidence proving his constructive possession of a firearm
  • stating in order for an appellant to prevail on a weight challenge, he must establish that the evidence supporting a conviction is “so tenuous, vague, and uncertain that the verdict shocks the conscience of the court.” (citation omitted)
  • stating in order for an appellant to prevail on a weight challenge, he must establish that the evidence supporting a conviction is “so tenuous, vague, and uncertain that the verdict shocks the conscience of the court.” (citation omitted)
  • stating in order for an appellant to prevail on a challenge to the weight of evidence, he must establish that the evidence supporting a conviction is “so tenuous, vague, and uncertain that the verdict shocks the conscience of the court.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lazarus, Dubow, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.