Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Penn

Citations

  • 132 A.3d 498
  • 2016 Pa. Super. 19
  • 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 58

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the test of disqualification is the juror’s ability and willingness to eliminate the influence of his or her scruples and render a verdict according to the evidence
  • concluding prospective juror who was “steeped in law enforcement” and said she would be more likely to believe the testimony of a police officer should have been stricken for cause
  • explaining “[t]he decision whether to disqualify a venireman is within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal absent a palpable abuse of that discretion”
  • finding court abused its discretion in denying motion to strike juror for cause and the error - 10 - J-A08032-19 was not harmless because defendant forced to use peremptory challenge
  • finding court abused its discretion in denying motion to strike juror for cause and the error - 10 - J-A08032-19 was not harmless because defendant forced to use peremptory challenge
  • finding court abused its discretion in denying motion to strike juror for cause and the error - 10 - J-A08032-19 was not harmless because defendant forced to use peremptory challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Olson, Stabile

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.