Commonwealth v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trooper’s testimony in bookmaking prosecution concerning informant’s statement that trooper could place bets by telephoning certain number was not hearsay, as it explained trooper’s subsequent actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Dargan
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-03-31· cited 55×
• Commonwealth v. Luddy
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-10-31· cited 50×
• Commonwealth v. Underwood
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-27· cited 33×
• Commonwealth v. Ryan
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-27· cited 25×
• Commonwealth v. Collazo
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-02-24· cited 25×
• Commonwealth v. Moore
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-13
• Commonwealth v. Dargon
  Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas· 2005-03-11

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mapp v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
• Aguilar v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
• Spinelli v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
• Commonwealth v. D'ANGELO
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-03-20· cited 65×
• Commonwealth v. Sampson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-11-26· cited 49×
• Commonwealth v. Jacobs
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-12-20· cited 41×
• Commonwealth v. Tselepis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-06-13· cited 37×
• Commonwealth v. Young
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-03-31· cited 12×