Commonwealth v. Tselepis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a statement is properly qualified as an explanation of a course of conduct if it is \evidence as to the reason action is taken[ ]\
• finding a statement is properly qualified as an explanation of a course of conduct if it is “evidence as to the reason action is taken[]”
• police acted upon informant’s tip that defendant was conducting a lottery. See also Commonwealth v. Underwood, 347 Pa.Super. 256, 261, 500 A.2d 820, 822 (1985
• officer’s testimony about informant’s tip that defendant was conducting a lottery was admissible as “evidence as to the reason action is taken” by police
• police acted upon informant’s tip that defendant was conducting a lottery
• police acted upon informant's tip that defendant was conducting a lottery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).