Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1/8/1963
Commonwealth v. Smith
Citations
- 409 Pa. 521
- 187 A.2d 267
- 1963 Pa. LEXIS 702
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- tying 9 CR 73 =2020 : ! the charge for overweight vehicle to the amount of excess weight was “quite sensible”
- the Legislature’s decision to graduate and increase the amount of the fines “was not irrational or unreasonable, but on the contrary was quite sensible”
- the Legislature’s decision to graduate and increase the amount of the fines “was not irrational or unreasonable, but on the contrary was quite sensible”
- graduated fines for overweight vehicles not irrational or unreasonable, and therefore not excessive
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-03· cited 640×
- Commonwealth v. Eisenberg, M., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-08-19· cited 206×
- Commonwealth v. McKennaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-01-26· cited 167×
- Commonwealth v. CornishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-02-28· cited 52×
- Commonwealth v. ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-10· cited 48×
- Philadelphia Facilities Management Corp. v. BiesterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-08· cited 23×
- KAUFFMAN v. OsserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-11-12· cited 21×
- State v. GoffeConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-05-28· cited 20×
- Paxon Maymar, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-11-27· cited 19×
- State v. KrahwinkelSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-12-23· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. GippleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-09-15· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. DunnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-04· cited 10×
- State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1982-09-23· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. HeggenstallerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-08-08· cited 8×
- Com. v. Ishankulov, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-04-20· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. TirpakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-26· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. MercerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-01-22· cited 6×
- State v. GeiseSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-12-23· cited 5×
- Austin v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-03-24· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. NugentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-06-10· cited 4×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bell AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-07-02· cited 101×
- Robinson Township School District v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-12-29· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. Dollar Savings BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1917-06-30· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. BristowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-01-21· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. HanzlikSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1960-01-11· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.