Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1/11/2005
Commonwealth v. Smith
Citations
- 866 A.2d 1138
- 2005 Pa. Super. 10
- 2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 11
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing Section 9714 as Pennsylvania’s “three strikes” law
- recognizing Section 9714 as Pennsylvania’s “three strikes” law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elliott, Joyce, Beck
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court· 1991-04-01· cited 2,917×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-10-19· cited 160×
- McMahon v. McMahonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-07-24· cited 99×
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-11-20· cited 94×
- Commonwealth v. DoyenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-04-26· cited 27×
- Com. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-17· cited 9×
- Alexander v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-03-19· cited 9×
- Alexander v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-04-07· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.