Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Smallwood

Citations

  • 155 A.3d 1054
  • 2017 Pa. Super. 25
  • 2017 WL 430278
  • 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 63

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[t]hese time limits are jurisdictional in nature” and “not subject to the doctrine of equitable tolling”
  • concluding petitioner who knew or had reason to know “newly-discovered fact” for more than 60 days failed to meet time-bar exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lazarus, Stabile, Dubow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.