Commonwealth v. Shaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that firing of BB gun into porch roof near victim created the danger of serious bodily harm sufficient to sustain REAP conviction.
• holding sufficient evidence to convict the defendant of REAP where he discharged a firearm into the ceiling of his porch and in close proximity to an individual
• evidence sufficient to sustain conviction for REAP where defendant fired gun into ceiling in close proximity to another person
• “This Court has held that both a handgun and a BB gun are capable of causing serious bodily injury or death.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Com. v. Headley, J.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-11-19· cited 14×
• Com. v. Bostian, B.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-05-14· cited 13×
• Com. v. Brockington, P.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-03-04· cited 1×
• Com. v. Brockington, P.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-03-27· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Reynolds
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-10-27· cited 255×
• Commonwealth v. Hartzell
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-09· cited 163×
• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-02-22· cited 161×
• Commonwealth v. Rodriguez
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-06-06· cited 66×
• Commonwealth v. Peer
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-10-28· cited 59×
• Commonwealth v. Wise
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-09-15· cited 47×
• Commonwealth v. Weimer
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-08-17· cited 45×
• Commonwealth v. Ramos
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-03-20· cited 33×
• Commonwealth v. Kamenar
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-21· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-06-25· cited 9×