Commonwealth v. Segida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• positing that the Commonwealth’s failure to adduce last-time-of-driving evidence was equally significant to the determinations under both Section 3802(a)(1) and (c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Segida
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-29· cited 185×
• Commonwealth v. Henkel
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-11-14· cited 50×
• Commonwealth v. Rakowski
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-01-14· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Starry, M., Aplt.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-01-22
• Commonwealth v. Dagutis
  Bucks County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-03-22
• Commonwealth v. Crespo
  Berks County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-10-28

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Reeves
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-07-31· cited 179×
• Commonwealth v. Griscavage
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-11-17· cited 176×
• Commonwealth v. Modaffare
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-22· cited 72×
• Commonwealth v. Kelley
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-12-28· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. Lenhart
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-02-01· cited 17×
• Pastore v. PA. INS. DEPT.
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-05-05· cited 15×