Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Sanford

Citations

  • 323 Pa. Super. 436
  • 470 A.2d 998
  • 1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3699

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • co-defendant’s redacted confession containing “we” and “us,” instead of specific names, admissible under Bruton

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beck, Hoffman, Hqffman, McEwen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.