Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Presbury

Citations

  • 665 A.2d 825
  • 445 Pa. Super. 362
  • 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2987

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the same rule in review of a trial court’s admission of prior inconsistent statements before formal adoption of the Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence
  • applying the same rule in review of a trial court’s admission of prior inconsistent statements before formal adoption of the Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence
  • applying the same rule in review of a trial court's admission of prior inconsistent statements before formal adoption of the Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence
  • witness's signature on statement at time it was made constituted \adoption\ even though at trial witness denied having made many portions of statement
  • “other guy” reference in redacted confession did not render confession inadmissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McEwen, Tamilia, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Commonwealth v. Presbury

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.