Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Sandusky

Citations

  • 70 A.3d 886
  • 2013 Pa. Super. 182
  • 2013 WL 3486856
  • 2013 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1648

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding a trial court’s protective order requiring defense counsel to disclose information to the trial judge and a supervising judge of a grand jury despite counsel’s claim that the information was his work product

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colville, Panella, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.