Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Sanchez

Citations

  • 716 A.2d 1221
  • 552 Pa. 570
  • 1998 Pa. LEXIS 1467

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a similar approach should be taken in the criminal context where the substantive laws of Pennsylvania conflict with those of a sister state
  • holding that in conflicts cases involving matters of procedure, we apply our own procedural laws when we are the forum state
  • holding information obtained through valid and legal means in a sister state may be used to establish probable cause for a search warrant in Pennsylvania even though means not valid in Pennsylvania
  • holding Pennsylvania’s choice-of-law interest analysis applies in criminal cases
  • “A substantive right is defined as a right to equal enjoyment of fundamental rights, privileges, and immunities[.]”
  • “In conflicts cases involving procedural matters Pennsylvania will apply its own procedural laws whenever serving as the forum state.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.