Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 7/21/1998
Commonwealth v. Sanchez
Citations
- 716 A.2d 1221
- 552 Pa. 570
- 1998 Pa. LEXIS 1467
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a similar approach should be taken in the criminal context where the substantive laws of Pennsylvania conflict with those of a sister state
- holding that in conflicts cases involving matters of procedure, we apply our own procedural laws when we are the forum state
- holding information obtained through valid and legal means in a sister state may be used to establish probable cause for a search warrant in Pennsylvania even though means not valid in Pennsylvania
- holding Pennsylvania’s choice-of-law interest analysis applies in criminal cases
- “A substantive right is defined as a right to equal enjoyment of fundamental rights, privileges, and immunities[.]”
- “In conflicts cases involving procedural matters Pennsylvania will apply its own procedural laws whenever serving as the forum state.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. EichingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-02-20· cited 275×
- Commonwealth v. GraysSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-07-25· cited 170×
- Commonwealth v. HousmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-29· cited 118×
- Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaThird Circuit· 2010-06-09· cited 72×
- Hammons, P. v. Ethicon, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-06-19· cited 33×
- Ferraro v. McCarthy-PascuzzoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-05-21· cited 32×
- Sheard v. J.J. DeLuca Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-05-07· cited 27×
- Larrison v. LarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-04-12· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. BlackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-08-25· cited 15×
- Murray, N. v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-02-20· cited 12×
- Sinha v. SinhaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-10-07· cited 8×
- Melmark, Inc. v. Schutt Ex Rel. SchuttSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-08-21
- T.M. v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-07-16
- Commonwealth v. Britton, S., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-04-22
- Kornfeind, W. v. New Werner Holding, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-08-16
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-02-04· cited 776×
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-10-14· cited 758×
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1997-07-24· cited 632×
- Commonwealth v. DavenportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-03-16· cited 232×
- Commonwealth v. MatosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-02-26· cited 208×
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-07-23· cited 177×
- Commonwealth v. OhleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-14· cited 157×
- Commonwealth v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-08-05· cited 142×
- Commonwealth v. BrionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-12-30· cited 107×
- Commonwealth v. DuncanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-05-20· cited 94×
- People v. MayberryCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-05-13· cited 58×
- Commonwealth v. BennettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-11-22· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. DennisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-12-08· cited 28×
- Frick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1981-09-18· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. CorboSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-01-29· cited 10×
- Commonwealth, State Board of Nurse Examiners v. RaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-24· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-02-28· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.