Commonwealth v. Ross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence was sufficient to show a threat of serious bodily injury where the defendant threatened the victim with an upraised knife
• evidence sufficient to show appellant, by the use of an upraised knife, threatened the victim with serious bodily injury
• evidence sufficient to show appellant, by the use of an upraised knife, threatened the victim with serious bodily injury
• evidence sufficient to show appellant, by the use of an upraised knife, threatened the victim with serious bodily injury
• evidence sufficient to show appellant, by the use of an upraised knife, threatened the victim with serious bodily injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Hopkins
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-02-23· cited 287×
• Commonwealth v. Rodriquez
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-03-27· cited 62×
• Commonwealth v. Ouch
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-11-27· cited 45×
• Commonwealth v. Kubis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-07-21· cited 37×
• Commonwealth v. Green
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-07-01· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Wynn
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-09-12· cited 12×
• Com. v. Williams, L
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-05-25
• Commonwealth v. Burton
  Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1990-06-12