Massachusetts Appeals Court· 9/25/2009

Commonwealth v. Rodriguez

Citations

75 Mass. App. Ct. 235
913 N.E.2d 880
2009 Mass. App. LEXIS 1163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that officers had probable cause to arrest defendant because “they observed the defendant attempting to swallow something” and, “(b)ased on their training and experience, [they] reasonably believed that the defendant was trying to swallow narcotics”
finding non-harmless error where jury’s only method of determining weight without relying on certificates would be “guesswork” on a “close question”
testifying officer not asked to identify substance based on his experience as narcotics officer
where officer not asked to identify marijuana based on his experience as narcotics officer, admission of drug certificate not harmless beyond reasonable doubt
defense theory premised on substance to be that stated in certificates supports finding of harmless error
detective testified some of the substances were field tested and found to be cocaine; error harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kafker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.