Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Madera

Citations

  • 76 Mass. App. Ct. 154
  • 920 N.E.2d 312
  • 2010 Mass. App. LEXIS 82
  • 2010 WL 188736

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding sufficient evidence of constructive possession where defendant had joint control over bedroom where drugs seized, slept there, and kept personal effects there
  • police officials with extensive training and experience in narcotics identified substance as marijuana, aiding court in finding erroneous admission of certificate of drug analysis harmless beyond reasonable doubt
  • detectives testified to their years of experience and training in narcotics
  • “Here the officer . . . described . . . the general practices of drug dealers and typical signs or tools of the trade, i.e., quantity of drug, packaging materials, and weighing implements, and the presence of cash, communication devices, and cutting materials”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fecteau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.