Commonwealth v. Ritchie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a continuance to procure a witness where counsel was unable to assure the court that such witness could be procured if continuance was granted
• finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a continuance to procure a witness where counsel was unable to assure the court that such witness could be procured if continuance was granted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In the Interest of A.J.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-07-10· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Prisk
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-12-31· cited 4×
• Commonwealth v. Grant
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-06-08· cited 1×
• In Re AJ
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-07-10

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. Maroney
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-11-14· cited 1,351×
• Commonwealth v. Evans
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-04-24· cited 119×
• Commonwealth v. Sherard
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-11-18· cited 115×
• Commonwealth v. Jennings
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-03-20· cited 50×
• Commonwealth v. McCaskill
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-10-21· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. Golson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-02-18· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Boyd
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-27· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. Ritchie
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-10-23· cited 3×