Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 9/26/2013
Commonwealth v. Reid
Citations
- 77 A.3d 579
- 621 Pa. 245
- 2013 WL 5379383
- 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2198
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that, “an absolute identity of factual backgrounds” is not required but “a mere de minimis duplication of factual and legal issues is insufficient to establish a logical relationship”
- reasoning that, “an absolute identity of factual backgrounds” is not required but “a mere de minimis duplication of factual and legal issues is insufficient to establish a logical relationship”
- stressing the significance of a substantial duplication of issues of law and fact before a logical relationship can be found
- applying earlier holding from Hude and instructing that courts considering the logical-relationship prong should look at the temporal and logical relationship among the charges to determine whether they arose from a single criminal episode
- separate drug transactions were not same criminal episode where different evidence was required to prove defendant’s guilt in the separate cases
- separate drug transactions were not same criminal episode where different evidence was required to prove defendant’s guilt in the separate cases
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baer, Castille, Eakin, McCaffery, Saylor, Stevens, Todd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. PerfettoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-08-30· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-06-11· cited 30×
- Com. v. Copes, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-05-26· cited 7×
- Com. v. Forrester-Westad, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-09-01· cited 1×
- Com. v. Ames, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-03-26
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. ChampneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-09-24· cited 563×
- Commonwealth v. HudeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-03-11· cited 170×
- Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-08-22· cited 153×
- Commonwealth v. BracaliellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-05-16· cited 148×
- Commonwealth v. FithianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-12-17· cited 140×
- Commonwealth v. NolanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-19· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. AnthonySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-08-25· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. GeorgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-02-15· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. ReidSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-01-04· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.