Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 10/25/1988
Commonwealth v. Reese
Citations
- 549 A.2d 909
- 520 Pa. 29
- 1988 Pa. LEXIS 294
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding a constitutional difference between the search of one's person and one's personal effects not in his possession or control
- explaining that the relationship test would make it “impossible for police to effectively search a premises where visitors are present because they would not know which items, clothing and containers could be searched and which could not be searched”
- explaining that the relationship test would make it “impossible for police to effectively search a premises where visitors are present because they would not know which items, clothing and containers could be searched and which could not be searched”
- “[T]he police are not prohibited from searching a visitor’s personal property (not on the person
- Pennsylvania particularity requirement more stringent than that of the Fourth Amendment because Pennsylvania particularity requirement precedes probable cause requirement
- warrant to search an apartment for drugs authorized search of a jacket found within
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Stout
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. KornSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-05-25· cited 133×
- Jones v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-01-25· cited 104×
- Commonwealth v. Abdul-SalaamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-06-18· cited 90×
- Commonwealth v. GrossmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-13· cited 76×
- Commonwealth v. WaltsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-12-23· cited 71×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-02-18· cited 65×
- Commonwealth v. CapleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-07-24· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. HippSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-12-05· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. DanforthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-06-14· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. BagleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-07-30· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. KeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-16· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. GracianiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-02-23· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. PettySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-03-10· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. BleighSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-01-09· cited 18×
- State of Arizona v. Alicia Leah GilstrapArizona Supreme Court· 2014-08-20· cited 17×
- In re J.V.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-11-01· cited 16×
- Houghton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1998-04-03· cited 15×
- People v. ColemanMichigan Supreme Court· 1990-09-12· cited 13×
- State v. WillsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-12-06· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. FriedmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-22· cited 11×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 2,082×
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1927-11-21· cited 1,400×
- Maryland v. GarrisonSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 1,107×
- Commonwealth v. PlatouSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-11-26· cited 113×
- Commonwealth v. ReeceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-03-20· cited 78×
- Commonwealth v. ReeseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-01-29· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.