Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Reed

Citations

  • 543 A.2d 587
  • 374 Pa. Super. 510
  • 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1932

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a defendant convicted of unlawfully receiving property taken in a burglary could not be ordered as part of his sentence under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 1106(a
  • defendant convicted of unlawfully receiving property taken in a burglary could not be ordered as part of his sentence under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 1106(a
  • order of restitution requiring a defendant to make restitution for a loss which, according to the record, he did not cause, is illegal
  • order of restitution requiring a defendant to make restitution for a loss which, according to the record, he did not cause, is illegal
  • Restitution cannot be ordered for property which Commonwealth has not proven was either stolen or recovered by the defendant
  • “In Commonwealth v. Balisteri, [329 Pa.Super. 148, 478 A.2d 5 (1984) ], this Court held that an Order of restitution which was not supported by the record was illegal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brosky, Wieand, Sole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.