Commonwealth v. McFarland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• including time between theft and arrest, and type and kind of property as factors in analysis
• “[T]here is not sufficient evidence to sustain the inference that appellants participated in the burglary and larceny merely because the stolen items were found in their possession over eleven months later.”
• convictions of burglary and larceny reversed; conviction of receiving stolen goods affirmed
• convictions of burglary and larceny reversed ; conviction of receiving stolen goods affirmed
• bonds stolen II months prior found in defendants’ possession; conviction affirmed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).