Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 5/21/1990
Commonwealth v. Redmond
Citations
- 577 A.2d 547
- 395 Pa. Super. 286
- 1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 952
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court correctly precluded evidence as a sanction where Commonwealth refused to reveal identity of confidential informant who had provided police with detailed information that another individual committed the decades-old murder for which the defendant had been charged
- trial court correctly precluded evidence as a sanction where Commonwealth refused to reveal identity of confidential informant who had provided police with detailed information that another individual committed the decades-old murder for which the defendant had been charged
- “[e]xculpatory evidence includes material that goes to the heart of the defendant’s guilt or innocence as well as that which might well alter the jury’s judgment of the credibility of a crucial prosecution witness” (internal quotation marks omitted
- “Exculpatory evidence includes material that goes to the heart of the defendant’s guilt or innocence as well as that which might well alter the jury’s judgment of the credibility of a crucial prosecution witness.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cirillo, Kelly, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. CrewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-04-21· cited 125×
- Commonwealth v. HudgensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-12-03· cited 55×
- Commonwealth v. McElroySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-09-01· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. JordanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-09-22· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. HerrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-04-25· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-02-23· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. HritzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-18· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-10-11· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. UlenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-04-30· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. RossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-04-19· cited 4×
- Davis v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-07-30· cited 3×
- Com. v. Jordan, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-09-22
- Commonwealth v. BeanBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-10-27
Cites
58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 7,003×
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 3,756×
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-03-25· cited 3,599×
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- New York v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 658×
- Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-04-16· cited 463×
- Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-09· cited 417×
- Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-04-28· cited 259×
- Commonwealth v. GarvinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-06-28· cited 218×
- United States v. Starusko, JohnThird Circuit· 1984-03-05· cited 172×
- Brocker v. BrockerSupreme Court· 1969-02-24· cited 151×
- Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-09-26· cited 146×
- Brocker v. BrockerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-03-15· cited 133×
- Okkerse v. HoweSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-15· cited 126×
- Commonwealth v. GeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-04-07· cited 119×
- Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-03-16· cited 101×
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-12-15· cited 93×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.