Commonwealth v. Proetto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant does not have reasonable expectation of privacy in contents of sent e-mail and chat rooms
• defendant does not have reasonable expectation of privacy in contents of sent e-mail and chat rooms
• sufficient evidence for corruption of minors conviction where defendant asked victim to prepare a tape of herself for him and engage in a sexual relationship
• person may consent by conduct to recording of message
• adopting the Superior Court’s opinion as its own
• adopting the Superior Court’s opinion as its own

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Arrington
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-02-28· cited 151×
• Com. v. Kurtz, J.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-04-28· cited 83×
• Commonwealth v. Cole
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-07-07· cited 33×
• Commonwealth v. Sodomsky
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-12-05· cited 28×
• Commonwealth v. Cruttenden
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-12-17· cited 15×
• Polito v. AOL Time Warner Inc.
  Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas· 2004-01-28· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Byrd, J., Aplt.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-07-29
• Com. v. Aguilar, S.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-06-10
• Com. v. Zealor, E.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2026-04-22

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Tilghman
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-03-29· cited 181×
• Commonwealth v. Proetto
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-03-28· cited 47×
• Commonwealth v. Proetto
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-01-31· cited 2×