Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/3/1993

Commonwealth v. Proctor

Citations

625 A.2d 1221
425 Pa. Super. 527
1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1794

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a mall parking lot that is open to the public for the purposes of vehicular traffic as a matter of right or custom is a trafficway for the purposes of the DUI statute
holding parking lot open to the public is a trafficway for purposes of DUI statute
holding that because “the evidence established that [the] appellant drove in a parking lot of a mall that is open to the public for shopping[,] … there was sufficient evidence for the jury to conclude that the parking area was a trafficway”
finding actual physical control, even though defendant was legally parked with motor running, when a witness testified that he saw defendant driving recklessly one half-hour prior to being found
parking lot of mall was open to public for shopping; thus, sufficient evidence existed for jury to conclude that parking area was a trafficway for purposes of Motor Vehicle Code
parking lot of mall was open to public for shopping; thus, sufficient evidence existed for jury to conclude that parking area was a trafficway for purposes of Motor Vehicle Code

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Popovich, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.