Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 4/23/1992
Commonwealth v. Osborne
Citations
- 606 A.2d 529
- 414 Pa. Super. 124
- 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1255
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant’s BAC fifty minutes after arrest of 0.1488% required Commonwealth to proffer expert relation back testimony to secure a conviction under 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3731(a)(4)
- defendant's BAC fifty minutes after arrest of 0.1488% required Commonwealth to proffer expert relation back testimony to secure a conviction under 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3731(a)(4)
- relation-back testimony required, even though test was taken within an hour of when defendant drove, since .1488 percent was not a substantial departure from .10%
- relation-back testimony required since .1488 percent was not a substantial departure from .10 and evidence established that defendant’s blood alcohol content was rising between driving and blood extraction
- judgment of sentence vacated because no expert testimony was presented relating a .1488 percent BAC finding back to when the defendant was driving, 50 minutes earlier
- “Ms. Osborne’s BAC was determined to be 0.1488 percent when she was tested at the hospital. We deem this reading not to be a substantial departure from 0.10 percent.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rowley, Elliott, Brosky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. MontiniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-04-27· cited 74×
- Commonwealth v. LoeperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-23· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. DudaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-05-31· cited 44×
- State v. ChristmasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-12-28· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. ProctorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-06-03· cited 28×
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-02-15· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-08-19· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. MurraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-03-21· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. StithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-06-24· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. ShadeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-07-26· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. DowningSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-08-24· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. CurranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-09-29· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. MukinaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-01-27· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. LoeperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-02-16· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. BrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-05-18
- Commonwealth v. BarudAlleghany County Court of Common Pleas· 1994-09-19
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. CabezaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-29· cited 222×
- Commonwealth v. SessomsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-07· cited 159×
- Commonwealth v. JarmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-22· cited 93×
- Commonwealth v. ModaffareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-22· cited 72×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.