Commonwealth v. Pon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We conclude that the records of closed criminal cases resulting in these particular' dispositions are not subject to a First Amendment presumption of access, and therefore that the sealing of a record under G. L. c. 276, § 100C, need not survive strict scrutiny”
• defendant admitted to sufficient facts for guilty finding
• collateral consequences include homelessness and unemployment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).