Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Phillips

Citations

  • 93 A.3d 847
  • 2014 Pa. Super. 113
  • 2014 WL 2535259
  • 2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where there is a deficient pro se, proper remedy is to vacate judgment of sentence and remand for new trial
  • holding that, the failure to advise a defendant of the elements of the offenses constitutes error
  • holding that, the failure to advise a defendant of the elements of the offenses constitutes error
  • noting, in a direct appeal, that this Court must first determine whether the trial court has met the minimum requirements of Rule 121
  • vacating judgment of sentence and remanding for further proceedings where trial court failed to meet minimum requirements of Rule 121
  • noting, in a direct appeal, that this Court must first determine whether the trial court has met the minimum requirements of Rule 121

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donohue, Gantman, Stabile

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.