Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Perry

Citations

  • 563 A.2d 511
  • 386 Pa. Super. 534
  • 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2489

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the PCRA is not the proper vehicle to challenge the Bureau of Corrections’ calculation of sentences
  • holding that the PCRA is not the proper vehicle to challenge the Bureau of Corrections' calculation of sentences
  • noting that claims of sentencing illegality based on a trial court’s failure to award time-credit are cognizable as due process challenges in PCRA proceedings
  • noting that claims of sentencing illegality based on failure to award credit time are cognizable as due-process challenges in PCRA proceedings
  • explaining that a challenge to the Department of Corrections’ computation or construction of sentence is  Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court. J-S71028-16 not actionable under the PCRA
  • filing a PCRA petition is not a proper method of contest ing the Bureau of Corrections’ calculation of sentences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sole, Kelly, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.