Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1/20/1989
Commonwealth v. Harris
Citations
- 553 A.2d 428
- 381 Pa. Super. 206
- 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 96
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “an appellant will not be permitted to contradict his own prior sworn statements at a guilty plea hearing.”
- by providing adequate no-merit letter, counsel ensures meaningful independent review by the court
- by providing adequate no-merit letter, counsel ensures meaningful independent review by the court
- “though the Anders brief submitted complies with neither the standards previously set forth . . . nor those subsequently announced in [Commonwealth v. Turner, 544 A.2d 927 (Pa. 1988), and Commonwealth v. Finley, 550 A.2d 213 (Pa.Super. 1988
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brosky, Kelly, Watkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. FriendSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-03-30· cited 238×
- Commonwealth v. BurwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-03-01· cited 103×
- Commonwealth v. PerrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-08-17· cited 78×
- Commonwealth v. LiebenspergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-07-14· cited 67×
- Commonwealth v. MapleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-06-08· cited 54×
- Kyle Campbell v. State of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2012-12-12· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. DukemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-03-26· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. KaufmannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-06-07· cited 17×
- Campbell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1989-04-11· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. PetersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-09-25· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-07-17· cited 14×
- Commonwealth Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. HemsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-03· cited 13×
- Jeremy Motyka v. State of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2017-12-05· cited 8×
- Victor R. Perez v. State of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2013-01-10· cited 5×
- Ricardo Ramirez v. State of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2014-05-09· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. FosterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-06-22· cited 1×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court· 1988-11-29· cited 13,912×
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-27· cited 4,184×
- Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-31· cited 4,104×
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 3,807×
- McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 1,718×
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court· 1954-03-15· cited 1,415×
- Commonwealth v. McClendonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-09-24· cited 771×
- Commonwealth v. LawsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-17· cited 180×
- Commonwealth v. SheehanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-12-20· cited 80×
- Commonwealth v. FieroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-07-07· cited 73×
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-11-14· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. SangriccoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-30· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-12-24· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. BonaparteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-09-03· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. GaitoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-04-18· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. CarrilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-09-16· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. SawyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-07-16· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-08-07· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. HollandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-12-17· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.