Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Perkins

Citations

  • 401 A.2d 1320
  • 485 Pa. 286
  • 1979 Pa. LEXIS 520

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirmance resulting from equally divided court; court unanimous regarding no right to choose photographs for array
  • where notes of testimony taken at criminal suppression hearing could not be transcribed, defense counsel and district attorney filed an agreed upon statement of the record pursuant to Pa.R.A.P.1924
  • equally divided Supreme Court allowed jury to be charged on accomplice liability even though indictment only charged defendant as a principal; opinion in support of affirmance relied on Model Penal Code comments and grouping of general accomplice provisions in one section

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Nix, Manderino, Larsen, Pomeroy, Reversal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.