Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Pelzer

Citations

  • 466 A.2d 159
  • 319 Pa. Super. 282
  • 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3944

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a ten-month delay was reasonable and not violative of former Rule 1409
  • holding that a ten-month delay was reasonable and not violative of former Rule 1409
  • “[A] quantitative approach, i.e. merely counting the days and months between conviction and parole violation hearing, is not determinative.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowley, Beck, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.