Commonwealth v. Reichle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that where the plea agreement contains a negotiated sentence which is accepted and imposed by the sentencing court, there is no authority to permit an excessiveness challenge
• stating that where the plea agreement contains a negotiated sentence which is accepted and imposed by the sentencing court, there is no authority to permit an excessiveness challenge
• noting that “there is no authority to permit a challenge to the discretionary aspects of [a] sentence” where the appellant received what was promised under the terms of an agreement
• dismissing Appellant’s appeal of discretionary aspects of sentence where she received precisely what she was promised under the terms of her negotiated plea agreement
• dismissing Appellant’s appeal of discretionary aspects of sentence where she received precisely what she was promised under the terms of her negotiated plea agreement
• dismissing Appellant’s appeal of discretionary aspects of sentence where she received precisely what she was promised under the terms of her negotiated plea agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).