Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Padgett

Citations

  • 348 A.2d 87
  • 465 Pa. 1
  • 1975 Pa. LEXIS 1105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that firing bullet in general area where vital organs are located is sufficient to prove specific intent to kill beyond reasonable doubt
  • holding that “we are not persuaded that it must be shown that the bullet fired from a revolver, a deadly weapon, initially entered a vital organ before the inference of specific intent to kill can arise.”
  • shot to victim’s arm was “in the general area in which vital organs are -8- J-S20034-23 located” and by itself was sufficient to prove specific intent to kill
  • “The firing of a bullet in the general area in which vital organs are located can in and of itself be sufficient to prove specific intent to kill beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.