Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Ortiz

Citations

  • 854 A.2d 1280
  • 2004 Pa. Super. 288
  • 2004 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, inter alia, that when considering a trial court’s decision regarding a motion to modify restitution, we are held to an abuse of discretion standard
  • explaining that the defendant may challenge the accuracy of the bills and has the right to bring in his own expert to assess whether the amount should be less
  • explaining that the defendant may challenge the accuracy of the bills and has the right to bring in his own expert to assess whether the amount should be less
  • Commonwealth is bound by restitution agreement reached -7- J-S40010-24 with defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudock, Joyce, Musmanno, Klein, Bender, Bowes, Gantman, McCaffery, Panella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.