Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 11/5/2001
Commonwealth v. Ortiz
Citations
- 786 A.2d 261
- 2001 Pa. Super. 308
- 2001 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that “[wjhile Ortiz’s behavior during the initial investigative detention may have merited further inquiry to determine if his anxiety was due to illegal conduct, nothing happened after the conclusion of the initial stop to provide Officer Baur further cause for suspicion.”
- “Without existence of a reasonable suspicion after the first encounter had ended, the second detention was unlawful”
- “Without the existence of a reasonable suspicion after the first encounter had ended, the second detention was unlawful.”
- “Without existence of a reasonable suspicion after the first encounter had ended, the second detention was unlawful”
- ‘Without the existence of reasonable suspicion after the first encounter had ended, the second detention was unlawful.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson, Melvin, Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-04-25· cited 502×
- Commonwealth v. KempSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-11-26· cited 122×
- In the Int. of: A.A., a Minor Appeal of: A.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-10-17· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. KeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-27· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. MaloneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-06-01· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-12-10· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-09-25· cited 12×
- Com. v. Hummel, A., IVSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-09-16· cited 7×
- In the Int. of: A.A., a Minor Appeal of: A.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-10-18· cited 5×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assn.Supreme Court· 1988-04-19· cited 953×
- Commonwealth v. StricklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-08-24· cited 408×
- Commonwealth v. MacOlinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-27· cited 227×
- Commonwealth v. ValetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-09-18· cited 223×
- Commonwealth v. MudrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-04-10· cited 170×
- Commonwealth v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-04-23· cited 151×
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-08-04· cited 136×
- Commonwealth v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-08-24· cited 124×
- Commonwealth v. PalmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-04-19· cited 80×
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-01-19· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. MoralesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-01-03· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-10-02· cited 43×
- Commonwealth v. GeorgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-01-13· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. Cruz OrtegaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-03-28· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. HoakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-08-12· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. PerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-04-17· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. LynchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-03-19· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. HoakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-08-19· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.