Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2/6/1956
Commonwealth v. Novak
Citations
- 384 Pa. 237
- 120 A.2d 543
- 1956 Pa. LEXIS 549
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where the interlocutory order, for all practical purposes, presents a somewhat final aspect, an appellate court will review it in order to safeguard basic human rights or to prevent a great injustice to a defendant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stern, Stearns, Jones, Bell, Musmanno, Arnold
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jolley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-04-07· cited 54×
- In Re: Petition of Arlen SpecterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-01-24· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-01-03· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. BunterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-10-12· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. ByrdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-05-02· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. ReaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-08-03· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. SwansonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-01-04· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. MoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-10-03· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-01-04· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. PomponiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-01-30· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. HunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-01-05· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. BarberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-04-03· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. WarePhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1970-06-19
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.