Commonwealth v. Bruno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no appeal from trial court’s order for appointment of a sanity commission to determine defendant’s competence, since “exceptional circumstances” did not exist
• a pre-trial order appointing a sanity commission not appealable
• a pre-trial order appointing a sanity commission not appealable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Bolden
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-04-28· cited 259×
• Chase Manhattan Bank v. Josephson
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-04-13· cited 75×
• Smith v. Westland Life Insurance
  California Supreme Court· 1975-08-28· cited 58×
• Commonwealth v. Washington
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-01-03· cited 44×
• Commonwealth v. Bruno
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-06-27· cited 31×
• Commonwealth v. Reagan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-08-03· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. Bennett
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-09-22· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Bruno
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-06· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Kilgallen
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-11-08· cited 78×
• Commonwealth v. Byrd
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-05-02· cited 32×
• Commonwealth ex rel. Fisher v. Stitzel
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1965-06-30· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. Novak
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-02-06· cited 20×
• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Peiffer v. Lederer
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1960-11-16· cited 15×
• Com. Ex Rel. Nichols v. Lederer
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1961-06-26· cited 9×
• Commonwealth ex rel. Tabb v. Youth Study Center Superintendent
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-05-21· cited 8×