Commonwealth v. Nieves

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a challenge to the application of a mandatory minimum sentence implicates the legality of the sentence which is a non-waivable issue
• concurring statement by Gantman, J.
• concurring statement by Gantman, J.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Haag
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-10-23· cited 53×
• Commonwealth v. Catt
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-05-10· cited 35×
• Commonwealth v. Love
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-09-19· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Misner
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-03-25· cited 5×
• Gigous v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-03-02· cited 3×
• Commonwealth v. Mock, M., Aplt.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-11-20

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Griffin
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-06-24· cited 420×
• Commonwealth v. Vasquez
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-01-28· cited 113×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-01-19· cited 28×
• Commonwealth v. Stafford
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-08-24· cited 20×