Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 6/25/2001

Commonwealth v. Natividad

Citations

773 A.2d 167
565 Pa. 348
2001 Pa. LEXIS 1296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that “[ejvidence of another crime is admissible where the conduct at issue is so closely related that proof of one criminal act tends to prove the other”
stating that \[e]vidence of another crime is admissible where the conduct at issue is so closely related that proof of one criminal act tends to prove the other\
discussing admissibility of evidence of other crimes where the conduct at issue is closely related
consolidation proper where identity of shooter in murder case was at issue and evidence in separate incident was relevant to establish that identity
“[W]here the legislature includes specific language in one section of the statute and excludes it from another, the language should not be implied where excluded.”
abrogated on other grounds, Commonwealth v. Freeman, 573 Pa. 532, 827 A.2d 385 (2003)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saylor, Zappala, Flaherty, Nigro, Cappy, Castille, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.