Commonwealth v. Murphy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Lawyers who present a child as a witness must cope with the threshold problem of establishing that the child is able to differentiate fact from fiction . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Dahl
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-02-18· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. Monzon
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-04-04· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Kartell
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-06-30· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Almeida
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-04-13· cited 4×
• Commonwealth v. Ike I.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-01-14· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Rodriguez
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-02-12· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Thomas
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-11-06· cited 116×
• Commonwealth v. Brusgulis
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-08-25· cited 48×
• Commonwealth v. Lee
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-03-07· cited 37×
• Commonwealth v. Fawcett
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-02· cited 15×
• People v. Wells
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1978-04-17· cited 12×
• Allen v. Guarente
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1925-06-27· cited 10×