Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Moore

Citations

  • 648 A.2d 331
  • 436 Pa. Super. 495
  • 1994 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2850

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that counsel was not ineffective for failing to preserve weight of the evidence challenge, since appellate court did not find the verdict shocking
  • holding that matters of credibility are solely within the province of the trier of fact
  • “it is within the province of the factfinder to determine the weight to be given to the testimony and to believe all, part, or none of the evidence.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tamilia, Elliott, Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.