Commonwealth v. Gonce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where Commonwealth moved for continuance due to court’s crowded docket, 120-day period under Article IV was tolled during period of court’s unavailability
• in related trial in which appellant was acquitted by jury, judge had expressed his disagreement with jury verdict
• in related trial in which appellant was acquitted by jury, judge had expressed his disagreement with jury verdict
• court may grant continuance when first available court date is beyond run-date
• court may grant continuance when first available court date is beyond run-date
• improper delivery of request for final disposition to County Clerk of Courts, rather than to the County District Attor ney, as required by Article III, did not entitle the prisoner to be tried within 180 days of his alleged request

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).