Commonwealth v. Molina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding trial counsel was not ineffective in failing to object to the prosecutor’s questioning of the victim and the appellant regarding the appellant’s illegal immigration status since such evidence was part of a chain or sequence of events and not unduly prejudicial
• a claim of defense counsel’s ineffectiveness fails to establish the prejudice prong where evidence of defendant’s guilt was overwhelming (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Kouma
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-05-29· cited 49×
• Commonwealth v. Bishop
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-11-16· cited 36×
• Pennington v. Pennington
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-07-30· cited 13×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Halley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-03-29· cited 346×
• Commonwealth v. Melendez-Rodriguez
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-24· cited 173×
• Commonwealth v. Saranchak
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-01-19· cited 88×
• Commonwealth v. Spencer
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-01-25· cited 36×
• Commonwealth v. Sanchez
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-08-02· cited 10×