Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Mitchell

Citations

  • 369 A.2d 846
  • 246 Pa. Super. 132
  • 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1572

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced
  • recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced
  • “the right not to have one’s silence used against one does not depend upon whether the right is asserted at the beginning of interrogation or later on”
  • \the right not to have one's silence used against one does not depend upon whether the right is asserted at the beginning of interrogation or later on\
  • \the right not to have one's silence used against one does not depend upon whether the right is asserted at the beginning of interrogation or later on\
  • a court cannot expect suspects under interrogation to talk like lawyers and the court had no difficulty determining the suspect re-asserted his right to silence even though that assertion took a casual form

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Van Voort

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.