Commonwealth v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• delay in holding preliminary hearing prevented inclusion of case on next grand jury docket and made it impossible for trial to begin within the time period mandated by Rule 1100.
• delay in holding preliminary hearing prevented inclusion of case on next grand jury docket and made it impossible for trial to begin within the time period mandated by Rule 1100.
• extension upheld where delay was attributable to district justice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Monosky
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-07-15· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Reisinger
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-12-02· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Freeman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-09-05· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. Coleman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-08-29· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. McLellan
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-12· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Wilson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-09-14· cited 1×
• Commonwealth v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-03-14

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Shelton
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-10-08· cited 279×
• Commonwealth v. Mayfield
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-10-08· cited 277×
• Commonwealth v. O'Shea
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-01-29· cited 107×
• Commonwealth v. Shelton
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-29· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Adams
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-12-01· cited 30×
• Commonwealth v. Silver
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-02-02· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. Mayfield
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-29· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. White
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-11-24· cited 3×