Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 8/29/1980
Commonwealth v. Coleman
Citations
- 421 A.2d 455
- 280 Pa. Super. 162
- 1980 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3037
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Commonwealth not entitled to extension where it could have listed case for trial during last six days of Rule 1100 period
- Commonwealth not entitled to extension where it could have listed case for trial during last six days of Rule 1100 period
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wickersham, Brosky, Eagen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. SheltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-10-08· cited 279×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-12-28· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. ShieldsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-03-31· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-03-31· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-02-18· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.