Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 4/18/1935
Commonwealth v. Millen
Citations
- 290 Mass. 406
- 195 N.E. 541
- 1935 Mass. LEXIS 1320
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no due process violation when judge decides motion for new trial on affidavits alone
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ltjmmus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1940-09-17· cited 242×
- Commonwealth v. StewartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-04-01· cited 164×
- Commonwealth v. De ChristoforoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1971-12-07· cited 147×
- Long v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1937-03-02· cited 121×
- Minot v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1946-03-04· cited 91×
- City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1940-11-22· cited 90×
- Commonwealth v. BernierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1971-03-08· cited 87×
- Commonwealth v. DiStasioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1936-04-07· cited 86×
- Commonwealth v. BlondinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1949-07-27· cited 77×
- Trade Mutual Liability Insurance v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1935-05-14· cited 76×
- Commonwealth v. GricusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1944-12-11· cited 76×
- Commonwealth v. GiacomazzaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1942-05-25· cited 72×
- Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1939-04-13· cited 60×
- Commonwealth v. NoxonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1946-05-10· cited 60×
- Commonwealth v. MannosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1942-02-25· cited 58×
- Commonwealth v. GranitoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1950-11-30· cited 54×
- Carilli v. HerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1939-04-18· cited 54×
- DeLuca v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1942-12-02· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. DoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1943-12-27· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. HullMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1937-01-02· cited 42×
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court· 1895-12-23· cited 544×
- Moore v. DempseySupreme Court· 1923-02-19· cited 518×
- Commonwealth v. DascalakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1923-06-20· cited 239×
- Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of LondonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1933-01-03· cited 131×
- Commonwealth v. MillenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1935-02-14· cited 103×
- Nalle v. OysterSupreme Court· 1913-06-16· cited 102×
- Commonwealth v. PolianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1934-12-01· cited 98×
- Commonwealth v. SaccoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1926-05-12· cited 86×
- Commonwealth v. DevereauxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1926-11-10· cited 57×
- Commonwealth v. FlecknerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1896-10-22· cited 55×
- Larson v. SylvesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1933-03-29· cited 55×
- Commonwealth v. Chin KeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1933-06-05· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. GedziumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1927-05-19· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1896-11-11· cited 43×
- Commonwealth v. CrapoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1912-05-27· cited 40×
- Commonwealth v. McKnightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1935-02-25· cited 39×
- McCusker v. GeigerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1907-03-07· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. VallarelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1930-11-25· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. SaccoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1927-04-05· cited 32×
- Nerbonne v. New England Steamship Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1934-12-04· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.